Drmarcia’s Blog

Creating Well Beings!

Hidden Dangers in your Cat’s food and supplements: Benzoic Acid January 12, 2010

A study published in 1972 in the Veterinary Record, entitled, Experimental Benzoic Acid Toxicity in the Cat, clearly showed that even small quantities of benzoic acid are toxic to cats. Symptoms of toxicity included: abnormal behavior, oral ulceration and salivation, internal  organ damage and death.

Benzoic acid continues to be added to food and supplements marketed for cats. Play it safe, read the ingredient list on any product purchased for feline consumption and avoid those that contain benzoic acid or PABA (parabenzoic acid).

 

Irradiated food is it Safe? April 2, 2009

Investigations were carried out on 8 specific pathogen-free cats (5 male and 3 female) from a colony experiencing “outbreaks” of progressive hind limb ataxia in 190 of 540 at-risk animals ranging from 3 months to 3 years old. These studies identified moderate to severe bilateral axonal degeneration within white matter regions of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal cord and in the white matter of the cerebral internal capsule and peduncle, in the roof of the fourth ventricle and inferior cerebellar peduncle, and in the external arcuate and pyramidal fibres of the medulla. There were varying degrees of accompanying microgliosis, astrocytosis, and capillary hyperplasia. Such a clinicopathologic syndrome, termed feline leukoencephalomyelopathy, has previously been described in cat colonies in Britain and New Zealand, although its etiology has not been determined. The degenerative nature of the lesions and their bilateral distribution suggest possible nutritional, metabolic, or toxic causes. Although these findings provide circumstantial evidence that the exclusive feeding of a gamma-irradiated diet of reduced vitamin A content is associated with the development of the neuronal lesions, further tissue micronutrient and antioxidant analysis will be required to support this hypothesis.

This study should have us thinking that perhaps the trend toward irradiating food for human consumption might be a bad idea. I personally wouldn’t eat food that I know had been irradiated. Will you?

Some of the dangers according to www.mercola.com

Food is irradiated using radioactivegamma sources, usually cobalt 60 or cesium 137, or high energy electron beams. The gamma rays break up the molecular structure of the food, forming positively and negatively charged particles called free radicals. The free radicals react with the food to create new chemical substances called “radiolytic products.” Those unique to the irradiation process are known as “unique radiolytic products” (URPs).
Some radiolytic products, such as formaldehyde, benzene, formic acid, and quinones are harmful to human health. Benzene, for example, is a known carcinogen. In one experiment, seven times more benzene was found in cooked, irradiated beef than in cooked, non-irradiated beef. Some URPs are completely new chemicals that have not even been identified, let alone tested for toxicity.

In addition, irradiation destroys essential vitamins, including vitamin A, thiamin, B2, B3, B6, B12, folic acid, C, E, and K; amino acid and essential polyunsaturated fatty acid content may also be affected. A 20 to 80 percent loss of any of these is not uncommon.

 In 2007 the FDA proposed some interesting changes to the labeling of irradiated food. They recommended the use of words like Pasteurized (much more palatable than irradiated) and that foods only needed to labeled if the radiation produced a detectable change in the color, taste or texture of the food. It is pretty obvious that we can’t depend on the FDA to protect us from radiation damaged food. So, we must protect ourselves.

 

 

 

Don’t Believe Everything you Read! March 12, 2009

This is an extremely one sided article that recently appeared in the South Florida Sun Sentinel.  Only one veterinarian was quoted and that veterinarian is an associate at a conventional veterinary clinic.   So, the holistic view point is not represented. I agree many foods are over priced for the ingredients that are contained within. Look at the label, if meat is not the first ingredient, put it back.  Diets made to feed dogs and cats should have meat as the first ingredient. If they have a grain product as the first ingredient they are using cheaper ingredients to “balance” the diet; therefor the product should cost less than other brands. You want to avoid products that contain large amounts of by-product and digests. If you see things like bha, bht and ethoxyquin on the label, don’t buy that product as these are preservatives that have been linked to cancer. 

 

Mon 02 Mar 2009 03:21
By Diane C. Lade
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Multiple Page View
A 5.5-ounce can of “holistic pheasant” cat food sells for $1.73 at a Fort Lauderdale specialty pet food store. Three blocks away, you can get the same sized can of a supermarket chain brand cat food for 39 cents.

Let’s examine this statement.  Without the entire label we can’t really evaluate the quality of the two cans of food. If the “holistic pheasant” canned food contains 95% pheasant meat  and the “supermarket” canned food contains 10% meat bi-product and 90% grains and digests. Then of course the Holistic brand would be worth the extra money. Just because the cans are the same size, means very little. LOOK AT THE ENTIRE LABEL AND READ IT CLOSELY.
Is the more expensive one better for your cat than the supermarket food?

YES, QUITE POSSIBLY THE MORE EXPENSIVE CAN IS THE BETTER FOOD, BUT YOU MUST READ THE ENTIRE INGREDIENT LABEL TO BE ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT FACT.
Not necessarily, at least according to eight dog and cat nutrition experts at seven well-known veterinary medical schools who were interviewed by Consumer Reports. The bottom line of the article in the magazine’s March issue: “There are quality foods at every price point,” This is a true statement, you can find quality foods at almost all price points, if you know how to read a label, said Jamie Kopf Hirsh, the associate health editor who wrote the piece.
Dr. Joseph Wakshlag, an assistant professor of clinical nutrition at the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, was more direct: There is no scientific evidence that “any food is better than the next,”  This would depend on the definition of “scientific evidence”. Most evidence based researchers look for double blind studies to qualify as scientific research, I doubt any pet food company has engaged in this type of research, regardless of price, he told Hirsh. Two years ago, a spate of pet food recalls — most connected to tainted wheat gluten imported from China — started consumers looking more closely at what they were feeding their pets. More than 100 brands ultimately were recalled and hundreds of animals are believed to have been sickened or died from eating these products.  Once again a true statement, companies that chose to buy cheap product from China found that their products were causing renal failure in pets who were consuming  the product. Food produced by companies who refuse to purchase inexpensive ingredients from countries with  lower product standards than the US will have a product that costs more per can.  This only makes sense, if you use more expensive ingredients your product will have to sell for more. If you cut corners by purchasing ingredients of questionable quality and safety you can set your price lower.
Food and Drug Administration Spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey said the agency, which regulates pet food along with the states, is working on updating pet food labeling requirements. But many pet owners remain confused by vague ingredient lists and terms that are more about marketing than nutrition.
Phrases like “holistic,” “gourmet” and “premium” now are commonly found on pet food packages. But any product could make these claims because they aren’t regulated and FDA does not define them.
There also are no FDA standards for “prescription” diets, usually sold by vets, and non-prescription diets. And “senior” foods do not need to be specially formulated, although manufacturers now must show proof of scientific claims, such as foods designed to reduce urinary tract infections.
Dr. Gary Edelson, an associate veterinarian with Hometown Animal Hospital and Dental Clinic in Weston, said there is no reason to believe higher-priced pet food is safer or more nutritious than less costly varieties. Once again this is true, the price doesn’t guarantee quality, the ingredient list does.
“[You] would like to think that the more expensive the diet, the more expensive the ingredients” — which may sometimes be true. “But expensive also could mean you are paying for a marketing campaign.”
He said the best way to tell that a pet is being fed the right product is if the animal is healthy and active, with a glossy coat.  How long would you have to feed an inferior diet and how sick would the animal have to be before external signs begin to show? I am not willing to base my pet’s health on a glossy coat.
Edelson always picks products with labels stating the food was developed through “animal feeding tests” under guidelines by the Association of American Feed Control Officers, a regulatory group that sets ingredient standards..
He also said he prefers companies with a nutritionist on staff, “so if there is a problem, I can talk to someone who can do some research on it.”
Diane Lade can be reached at dlade@sunsentinel.com or 954-356-4295 or 561-243-6618.

So, you have my two cents worth, I would like to hear yours, please leave comments on this very important topic. If you have questions about your pets food, take a look at “the whole dog Journal” the print reports on the best pet foods each year. The Whole Dog Journal provides a wealth of information for dog owners.

 

Feeding Cats February 10, 2009

There is no single topic in animal health more misunderstood than feline nutrition.  If you learn nothing else from this blog it should be this: Cats should never be fed dry, processed kibbled cat food. Contrary to popular belief, dry food diets do not promote dental health. In fact they do just the opposite. Cats fed a dry food diet are much more likely to develop stomatitis. 

Stomatitis is a severe inflammation of the gums of cats. This condition can be very painful, stopping a cat from eating. Current conventional treatments include, dental cleaning, antibiotics, steroids and full mouth extractions.

Domestic cats, like their larger wild cousins, are obligate carnivores. They are built to eat large quantities of protein.  Cats actually lack some of the enzymes necessary to digest complex carbohydrates. Unlike omnivores, cats can not adjust their energy requirements when faced with a low protein diet. This means that the low protein diets tauted by the pet food companies to treat renal disease in cats, actually starve the cats of protein and therefor energy.  Visit www.felinefuture.com to learn more about feline nutrition.

Real food consisting of 75% fresh raw meat is  the  diet of choice for domestic cats.  Grains have no place in a diet meant for cats.

Did you know that cats in the  wild rarely drink water? They depend on their food sources to also provide the water that they need.  A nice juicy rat is the perfect meal, containing both high quality protein along with more than adequate moisture.  Dry food diets cause dehydration in domestic cats, putting a strain on the kidneys and contributing to renal disease.

If you can’t fit a quality raw food diet into your lifestyle, a high quality holistic canned food diet is the next best option. There so many new brands of “Grain free or core” diets on the market, finding one that your cat will like should be easy.

In 1939, Francis M. Pottinger, published “Pottinger’s Cats”. This study clearly showed the benefits of a raw food diet in cats. http://www.ppnf.org/catalog/ppnf/Articles/PottsCats.htm follow this link to read more about his fascinating study

Another site worth visting is www.rexforhealth.com

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.